"Sexual selection through mate choice has long been recognized as an important driver of phenotypic diversity" Clifford Bohm, Acacia L. Ackles, Charles Ofria, Arend Hintze, "On Sexual Selection in the Presence of Multiple Costly Displays" Alife 2019 https://direct.mit.edu/isal/proceedings/isal2019/247/99225 David Ackley and Michael Littman. 1991. Interactions between learning and evolution. Artificial life II 10 (1991), 487--509 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=David+Ackley+and+Michael+Littman.+1991.+Interactions+between+learning+and+evolution.+Artificial+life+II+10+%281991%29%2C+487%2D%2D509. Lisa M. Guntly and Daniel R. Tauritz. 2011. Learning individual mating preferences. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. ACM, 1069--1076. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2001576.2001721 Chien-Feng Huang. 2002. A study of mate selection in genetic algorithms. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/935557 Dylan Ashley, V Chockalingam, Brandy Kuzma, Vadim Bulitko, 2019. Learning to select mates in artificial life. Gecco ‘19. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3319619.3322060 Gregory M. Werner and Peter M. Todd. 1997. Too many love songs: Sexual selection and the evolution of communication. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press/Bradford Books, 434--443. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Gregory+M.+Werner+and+Peter+M.+Todd.+1997.+Too+many+love+songs%3A+Sexual+selection+and+the+evolution+of+communication.+In+Proceedings+of+the+European+Conference+on+Artificial+Life.+MIT+Press%2FBradford+Books%2C+434%2D%2D443. Learning individual mating preferences Gently 2011 Guntly D. R. Ashley, V. Chockalingam, B. Kuzma and V. Bulitko, "Learning to Select Mates in Evolving Non-playable Characters," 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 2019, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/CIG.2019.8848114. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8848114 Thomas P. Gosden, Adam J. Reddiex, and Stephen F. Chenoweth, "Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness" https://www.pnas.org/content/115/21/5498 Theory has begun to highlight how mutual mate choice could generate coevolutionary processes that either enhance or constrain diversification depending on the mating system and the sex-specific fitness benefits of choice 7,9,11